The IPE Real Assets top 100 ranking of some of the world’s largest infrastructure investors has captured more than $467bn (€388bn) in infrastructure assets held by pension funds, sovereign-wealth funds, insurers and other institutional capital owners.

It was based on IPE Research survey data, Rainmaker information and publicly available information, predominantly in the form of annual reports. Where accurate numbers were not available, estimates have been made. Some investors have not been included due to a lack of information.

We also asked investors about their allocations, investment intentions and views on the market. This survey was conducted between late June and early August, amid a very different scenario to previous years. The COVID-19 pandemic is the biggest test for the asset class following substantial growth in the decade that followed the global financial crisis.

Although transport infrastructure assets – toll roads and airports – have been adversely affected, the asset class, as a whole, seems to be passing the test and living up to its reputation as a stabilising ingredient in multi-asset portfolios. More than two thirds of investors say COVID-19 has had no effect on their infrastructure investments (figure 20).

Only 11% have placed a moratorium on new investments, while the same amount are looking to increase their exposure as a result of the pandemic. None of the investors surveyed are looking to decrease their exposure in response, while 3% say the situation has prompted a change in strategy.

Furthermore, 57% of infrastructure investors expect to invest or commit a greater volume of capital over the coming 12 months, and 27% intend to maintain the same level of investment (figure 5). As for allocations, 62% expect theirs to rise and 35% plan to maintain current levels.

The findings are consistent with anecdotal evidence. “Overall, the infrastructure portfolio has performed well through the pandemic, with positive returns year-to-date, which reflect a well diversified portfolio,” says Tim Formuziewich, managing director of Infrastructure at Investment Management Corporation of Ontario (IMCO), which manages investments for the Ontario Pension Board and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.

Top 100 at a glance 1

Top 100 at a glance 2

Top 100 at a glance 3

Over the summer, IMCO invested in fibre network company euNetworks alongside Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners. “We actually anticipate a significant increase in investment activity throughout the rest of 2020 and continuing into 2021, relative to the first half of the year,” says Formuziewich.

Neil King, managing director and head of infrastructure for Europe at Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP Investments), says: “As with all investors, we have seen some impacts across the portfolio, particularly on the toll roads. The advantage we have is we invest in infrastructure for the very long term, which allows us to deploy our capital to best effect and to be patient across economic cycles. 

Fibre-optic cables, telecoms and renewable energy were named joint top-favourite sectors for investment

Fibre-optic cables, telecoms and renewable energy were named joint top-favourite sectors for investment

“Our view of the crisis and the consequent economic weakness we will see across the world can be taken in that light, and so as long as life returns to normal over a sensible timeframe, then over the long term the value impacts will be low.”

While limitations on travel and in-person meeting are “slowing things down in the short term”, King says “we are carefully monitoring the markets for investment opportunities”. He adds: “We have seen increased market activity levels in recent weeks and we anticipate those will continue to increase as the practical barriers are reduced.”

And echoing the findings, neither IMCO nor CPP Investments is planning to change their strategies as a result of the pandemic. “No, we remain committed to our strategy of building a diversified portfolio with absolute-return targets,” Formuziewich says.

King says: “We aren’t planning any major changes to our investment strategy.”

The same applies to Swedish pension fund Alecta, which recently began investing in the asset class, last year committing €600m to three infrastructure funds. “We expect to maintain our investment activity at the current high level in the coming years,” says Frans Heijbel, head of international real assets.

Asked whether Alecta has been tempted to change its strategy at such an early stage, he says: “Not really, as our strategy was always meant to create a portfolio with relatively stable and predictable returns uncorrelated to the economic cycle.”

The entrance of Alecta, which is one of the largest institutions in Sweden, shows the ongoing appeal of the asset class to major investors that have yet to gain exposure. Of the 30% of survey respondents that do not invest in infrastructure, half say they might invest in the future and 13% have definite plans to do so.

The main impediment to investing in infrastructure seems to be the size of investors, making it difficult to make a meaningful allocation to the asset class (figure 3). Of those investors that do not invest in infrastructure, only 19% were not persuaded by the risk-return profile or diversification benefits. This proportion was down significantly on last year’s 41%.

Illiquidity, unsuitability of available products and a lack of suitable external advice were all joint-second as reasons for not allocating to infrastructure. Asked to describe the main impediments, investors cited a wider range of factors:

● Availability of high-qualified assets;
● Internal capabilities;
● Transparency in the non-listed market;
● Choosing a benchmark;
● Deciding what asset class to put infrastructure funds into;
● Lack of in-house expertise;
● Valuation, political risk, liquidity;
● Fee structures;
● Getting capital called and invested in a timely manner.

A common topic about infrastructure is whether the asset class is too expensive. This year’s survey shows that nearly three quarters of investors believe it is not, similar to last year’s 72%, and significantly higher than the 54% recorded in 2018.

“It is expensive compared to historical multiples,” says Heijbel. “But not necessarily relative the current interest-rate environment.”

Formuziewich says: “Certainly, the alpha available in infrastructure has come down in core North American and European infrastructure over the last 10 years. Nonetheless, there are still opportunities to acquire risk on an attractive basis although less systemically than in the past. One way of doing so, that we are focused on, is through greenfield investment. Greenfield moves the needle more for us than some of our peers.”

In terms of investment intentions, infrastructure investors are favouring Europe (figure 1), although this might reflect a slightly heavy European weighting in terms of investor domicile.

Only 31% of investors have exposure to infrastructure in emerging markets, and 8% are considering moving in this direction (figure 15).

While most, unsurprisingly, expected transport assets to be most affected by COVID-19 (figure 22), there is a clear investor preference for renewable energy, and telecommunications and digital infrastructure (figure 21).

“Our current core infrastructure portfolio is focused on toll roads and regulated utilities, as well as a growing portfolio of renewable energy across wind, solar and hydro,” says King. “In line with the overall goals of CPP Investments, we are looking to increase exposure in our core emerging markets in Latin America, India and Asia. But we do not have a rigidly defined portfolio construction approach to new investments; instead our key objective is to maximise long-term risk-adjusted returns by backing great infrastructure businesses.”

Formuziewich  adds: “We are looking to build a diversified portfolio with investments that behave differently to each other. We seek to make each investment on a basis that delivers strong risk-adjusted returns with asymmetric returns to the upside. If we can do that consistently, we believe that our portfolio will outperform.”

Social infrastructure came second after renewables and digital, and there is an emerging question about whether institutional investors will move further into this part of the market in a post-COVID-19 world. 

Fibre-optic cables, telecoms and renewable energy were named joint top-favourite sectors for investment

“Prior to the pandemic, we felt that institutional investment in infrastructure would increase generally and that social infrastructure would be a beneficiary of growth in infrastructure capital,” says Formuziewich. “From a policy perspective, we believe it is possible that some governments around the world will re-prioritise certain aspects of social infrastructure that will generally create some investment opportunities for private investors.”

Heijbel says: “COVID-19 will most likely change certain behaviours and create future new opportunities for investing in the built environment.”

More than two-thirds of investors have an environment, social and governance (ESG) policy and/or strategy that covers infrastructure (figure 16), and for the vast majority this goes beyond investing in renewable energy (figure 17).

Less than a quarter are seeking to make a social impact through their infrastructure investments, although 35% are considering or planning to do so (figure 18). Only 8% would accept a lower return in exchange for making social impact (figure 19).

“We constantly seek the best investment opportunities that can also lead to a positive impact on society and the environment,” says Formuziewich. “However, our fiduciary duty comes first, and we won’t sacrifice returns themselves.”

Heijbel adds: “We are certainly interested in making a social impact through infrastructure investments. Infrastructure investing is not only about maximising returns, but rather the risk-adjusted return in our view.” 

survey results 1

survey results 2

survey results 3

survey results 4

survey results 5

survey results 6

survey results 7

survey results 8

survey results 9

survey results 10

survey results 11

survey results 12

survey results 13

survey results 14

survey results 15

survey results 16

survey results 17

survey results 18

survey results 19

survey results 20

survey results 21

survey results 22

 InvestorCountryInfrastructure assets ($’000)Total assets ($’000)
1 Allianz Germany 34,939,700 890,289,000
2 Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Canada 26,848,300 317,790,000
3 CDPQ Canada 21,273,700 260,258,000
4 National Pension Service South Korea 20,467,100 636,167,000
5 ADIA UAE 17,388,634 579,621,120
6 APG Netherlands 17,070,000 602,592,000
7 OMERS Canada 16,336,300 84,794,700
8 AXA France 13,139,500 874,475,000
9 Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Canada 12,997,600 156,144,000
10 PSP Investments Canada 12,580,400 125,804,000
11 AustralianSuper Australia 12,500,500 120,581,000
12 PGGM Netherlands 11,534,600 252,300,000
13 UniSuper Australia 8,913,240 58,218,900
14 Teacher Retirement System of Texas US 8,800,000 148,100,000
15 MEAG Munich ERGO Germany 8,419,110 369,374,000
16 AIMCo Canada 8,329,400 77,901,900
17 Future Fund Australia 8,283,540 117,535,000
18 Legal & General UK 7,604,680 735,295,000
19 QSuper Australia 7,124,710 80,645,200
20 USS UK 6,999,630 89,213,400
21 Manulife Canada 6,775,430 295,762,000
22 ATP Denmark 6,760,830 53,202,200
23 Washington State Investment Board US 6,100,000 137,700,000
24 Aware Super Australia 5,844,690 82,513,300
25 Aviva UK 5,246,420 603,394,000
26 Samsung Life South Korea 5,156,570 190,984,000
27 Employees Provident Fund Malaysia 5,097,320 210,550,000
28 Government Pension Investment Fund Japan 5,055,010 1,396,600,000
29 KIC South Korea 4,850,000 157,300,000
30 CalPERS US 4,700,000 380,000,000
31 CBUS Australia 4,432,090 41,443,000
32 IMCO Canada 4,361,870 53,796,400
33 HESTA Australia 4,172,930 37,640,100
34 CalSTRS US 4,100,000 236,900,000
35 NSW Treasury Corporation Australia 3,916,570 52,119,500
36 PKA Denmark 3,747,690 49,469,500
37 Bayerische Versorgungskammer Germany 3,645,150 104,147,000
38 PensionDanmark Denmark 3,387,910 40,639,900
39 State Super (NSW) Australia 3,386,780 28,720,000
40 Industriens Pension Denmark 3,118,380 27,376,000
41 New York Common Retirement Fund US 3,100,000 218,000,000
42 Generali Italy 3,056,550 720,589,000
43 Sunsuper Australia 2,957,920 50,764,700
44 Hostplus Australia 2,874,010 30,699,600
45 TIAA US 2,825,000 307,700,000
46 Talanx Germany 2,799,650 137,338,000
47 Ärzteversorgung Westfalen-Lippe Germany 2,782,850 16,095,400
48 REST Australia 2,778,100 40,673,600
49 Oregon PERF US 2,700,000 72,700,000
50 Swiss Life Switzerland 2,697,960 234,881,000
51 Pennsylvania PSERS US 2,300,000 55,800,000
52 New York City Retirement Systems US 2,155,000 198,986,000
53 CFS FirstChoice Australia 2,116,970 56,151,000
54 AMF Sweden 2,073,290 55,944,500
55 The Crown Estate UK 2,065,870 18,919,500
56 Desjardins Group Canada 1,895,580 11,572,700
57 BT Pension Scheme UK 1,846,370 69,481,700
58 OPTRUST Canada 1,840,400 16,575,900
59 Virginia Retirement System US 1,800,000 81,600,000
60 AP3 Sweden 1,772,040 42,192,500
61 Gothaer Germany 1,733,420 37,964,800
62 Ilmarinen Finland 1,724,590 56,584,100
63 IST Investmentstiftung Switzerland 1,638,740 10,924,900
64 LACERA US 1,590,000 54,500,000
65 Maine PERS US 1,530,000 14,700,000
66 PFA Penson Denmark 1,409,230 85,063,400
67 AMP Super Australia 1,405,650 70,582,600
68 Danica Pension Denmark 1,332,750 66,637,600
69 Alberta Heritage Savings Trust Fund Canada 1,331,150 11,832,300
70 British Columbia Investment Corp Canada 1,296,430 121,355,000
71 ESSSuper Australia 1,275,660 20,995,400
72 WorkSafeBC Canada 1,256,950 14,959,800
73 Zurich Investment Foundation Switzerland 1,200,000 38,000,000
74 Lothian Pension Fund UK 1,172,090 10,418,600
75 AP1 Sweden 1,168,140 39,202,500
76 Commonwealth Super Australia 1,156,930 35,013,500
77 Swiss RE Switzerland 1,147,000 103,746,000
78 MN Netherlands 1,112,020 171,339,000
79 Sampension Denmark 1,011,280 46,936,900
80 Texas ERS US 1,000,000 27,100,000
81 PUBLICA Switzerland 990,100 42,234,300
82 Mercer Super Trust Australia 963,465 17,770,800
83 Alberta Teachers’ Retirement Fund Canada 946,920 13,641,400
84 NAEV Germany 935,458 15,335,400
85 MTAA Super Australia 890,564 8,968,270
86 NGS Super Australia 847,615 8,151,460
87 Florida State Board of Administration US 820,000 148,000,000
88 Telstra Super Australia 806,722 15,706,900
89 MLC Super Fund Australia 801,681 57,359,800
90 UTIMCO US 799,800 35,471,700
91 Lægernes Pension Denmark 794,819 14,306,700
92 New Mexico State Inv. Council US 766,000 25,230,000
93 Keva Finland 758,482 62,898,100
94 Care Super Australia 751,588 13,928,700
95 ASGA Pensionkasse Switzerland 750,783 20,569,400
96 Zurich Insurance Group Switzerland 747,000 205,000,000
97 Migros Switzerland 722,992 26,771,600
98 Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Co. Finland 708,032 52,855,200
99 Pension Fund Association Japan 690,879 98,299,500
100 PGB Netherlands 672,966 33,536,100